9 responses to “Frisking Kalam”

  1. avataram

    Actually it is good to frisk Kalam as he is a Muslim.

    If we gave up all political correctness and frisked all muslims thoroughly irrespective of stature, it will save a lot of time for 5 billion other people on earth when flying.

  2. Sameer

    The key reason for the existence of protocol should be precisely this rather than honour, insult, etc.

  3. Alan Smithee

    Why can’t we just stop these silly security procedures? After all Obama is in the White House and the terrorists stopped being terrorists when Bush left.

  4. Ritwik

    Airport security checks are usually constrained for time?

  5. Gaurav

    You really need to take a break from blogging.

  6. raj

    By the same token, granting discretionary powers to local airline staff to exempt certain VIPs from frisking, can increase the probability of a ‘wrong one’ going past without a check. Airlines, as much as possible, like to issue one set of common guidelines to be implemented all over the world. It will be too much of a hassle to customise rules for one country at a time and draw up a specific list of people to be exempted. And such lists have to be updated frequently, adding to the hassle. It is far easier for them to insist on 100% compliance, and face the consequence of an occasional flare-up such as what happened after the Kalam episode. The outcry will die down by itself.

  7. I

    Avataram, right on. Even though the specialty of an average Moslem is not suicide bombing but wife-beating and polygamy.

Leave a Reply

Bad Behavior has blocked 471 access attempts in the last 7 days.