{"id":328,"date":"2005-05-16T18:34:17","date_gmt":"2005-05-16T07:34:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/2005\/05\/16\/ab-tak-ek-sau-unnis\/"},"modified":"2005-05-16T16:52:15","modified_gmt":"2005-05-16T11:22:15","slug":"ab-tak-ek-sau-unnis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/classic\/200505\/ab-tak-ek-sau-unnis\/","title":{"rendered":"Ab tak ek sau unnis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Wow! As I read this, there are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.yazadjal.com\/2005\/05\/poverty_footwear_and.html\">119<\/a> comments on Yazad&#8217;s post about poverty and if Yazad&#8217;s blog weren&#8217;t acting up a bit,  I suspect there would be more. Unfortunately, much of the debate seems to be centred on Amit and others trying to get Dilip to confess to something.  I don&#8217;t see the point. The question is not what he believes in his heart, but what he conveys through his article. I must insist that we look <i>only<\/i> at what the article says and not at any subsequent clarifications that he gives at Yazad&#8217;s place. The reason is simple. An article on Rediff and the Hindu reaches lakhs of ill-informed readers who aren&#8217;t going to come over to Yazad&#8217;s place to get further education on the topic. They are going to leave with an &#8220;overwhelming impression&#8221; and it is that impression that I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/2005\/05\/05\/a-beginners-guide-to-talking-about-reforms-and-the-poor\/\">am concerned with<\/a>.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThen Abinandanan <a href=\"http:\/\/nanopolitan.blogspot.com\/2005\/05\/sweet-irony.html\">responds<\/a> to my post, saying&#8230; I am not sure exactly what. The points he raises would have been answered if he had actually completed reading my post. But let me try again. <\/p>\n<p>Abi points out that in <i>conclusion<\/i>  Dilip says that he has no doubts in his mind that reforms must happen.  But why must they? Go read Dilip&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/in.rediff.com\/news\/2005\/apr\/15dilip.htm\">article<\/a> again. He says that he sees <i>more<\/i> poor people than 15 years ago. Poverty was reducing even during the Socialist era. The green revolution reduced poverty from around 55% to 40% over a period of 25-odd years (figures quoted from memory &#8211; don&#8217;t hold me to them). If you thought that this trend had <i>reversed<\/i>,  would you still support reforms? No, don&#8217;t give me that stuff about pursuing reforms in &#8220;some other way&#8221;. That is not going to work. If a doctor replaces a treatment that has been improving your condition too slowly for your comfort with a treatment that makes you worse, what would be the first thing the doctor would do? A doctor I trust would first <i>stop the new treatment<\/i> and put you back on the old one. He wouldn&#8217;t tinker with the new treatment. It has failed &#8211; by the only standard of success that matters.  So why does Dilip think that reforms should continue? I find no answer in the article. The only way the article can be consistent is if by &#8220;reforms&#8221; he means something completely and fundamentally different from free market reforms. Or perhaps he has some other reason to continue to support reforms &#8211; reasons he hasn&#8217;t mentioned. But&#8230; <i>shouldn&#8217;t he mention them to provide a balanced view<\/i>? <\/p>\n<p>So here is the reading comprehension question. Based on the article, explain to me <i>why<\/i>  Dilip supports reforms. If you can&#8217;t, I am right.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wow! As I read this, there are 119 comments on Yazad&#8217;s post about poverty and if Yazad&#8217;s blog weren&#8217;t acting up a bit, I suspect there would be more. Unfortunately, much of the debate seems to be centred on Amit and others trying to get Dilip to confess to something. I don&#8217;t see the point. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ravikiran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}